A Divided America: Trump’s 2024 Win Exposes Economic Angst, Cultural Divisions, and Political Frustration


dark sky with capital split in half between red and blue

In 2024, Donald Trump reclaimed the presidency by capitalizing on voters’ anxieties about economic instability, rapid social change, distrust in the political establishment, and concerns over border security. While Vice President Kamala Harris broke barriers as the first Black woman on a major ticket, her campaign struggled to unify an electorate deeply divided along economic, social, and ideological lines. Trump’s victory was a testament to his loyal base and a reflection of the underlying forces shaping American politics today.

Economic Instability: A Deep-Rooted Anxiety

Economic uncertainty was the main issue uniting Trump’s coalition, with inflation, stagnant wages, and job insecurity affecting nearly every demographic. Exit polls showed that 63% of voters rated the economy as “poor” or “not so good,” many felt they were falling behind. As prices for essentials like housing, food, and gas rose, people feared for their financial future. Trump’s promises to cut taxes and bring back American manufacturing resonated with those who felt squeezed by a challenging economy.

White working-class voters, long a core of Trump’s base, responded to his straightforward messaging on jobs and inflation. But his appeal went beyond this group, capturing support from Latino and Black men who felt sidelined in a fragile job market. For these voters, Trump’s approach felt practical and grounded in their everyday struggles, contrasting with what they saw as Harris’s more abstract policy agenda.

Cultural Conservatism and Pushback Against “Woke” Policies

A key component of Trump’s strategy was tapping into cultural concerns, particularly among suburban and rural voters worried about social shifts around gender, family, and identity. Anti-transgender ads aired by Trump’s campaign painted Harris as “too radical” on issues of gender and identity, a message that resonated with conservative voters who felt alienated by progressive policies.

Latino voters, who often hold socially conservative values, felt this tension as well. Although Harris’s policies were inclusive, some Latino voters saw Trump as a defender of traditional family structures and values. Similarly, many white suburban women—despite supporting reproductive rights—felt uneasy about rapid cultural shifts and prioritized economic stability. Trump’s campaign exploited these concerns, positioning him as a safeguard against what some viewed as overly progressive social change.

The Appeal to Young Male Voters: Anti-Establishment and “Free Speech” Rhetoric

One surprising element of Trump’s 2024 coalition was his support among young male voters, particularly those who felt disconnected from mainstream political discourse. Many young men, both Black and white, gravitated toward Trump’s unapologetic stance against “woke” culture and political correctness. Roughly 27% of young men cited concerns about cancel culture, while 30% listed economic opportunity as their main issue.

Trump’s outreach to this group was calculated; he appeared on social media channels popular with young men and engaged with influencers who shared their skepticism toward establishment politics. For these young men, Trump’s campaign became a platform for rejecting elitism and asserting their frustrations with a culture they felt was dismissive of their concerns.

Border Security: Reinforcing Fears of “Safety” and Economic Threats

Trump’s longstanding focus on border security remained a central element of his 2024 campaign, resonating with voters who viewed the southern border as a direct threat to both public safety and economic stability. For many rural and suburban voters, particularly white working-class individuals, the narrative that undocumented immigrants could take jobs and drain resources remained compelling. About 22% of voters who cited immigration as a top concern saw Trump’s hardline stance as essential to safeguarding American jobs and communities.

Trump’s rhetoric targeted white suburban women in particular, framing border security as a “protective” measure against potential harm to women and children. For these voters, who were already navigating economic fears, the message of stability and safety at the border added another layer of appeal to Trump’s campaign, further solidifying their support even when social values didn’t align perfectly with his broader agenda.

The Complex Role of White Women Voters: Abortion Rights and Economic Anxiety

White women voters, particularly suburban women, turned out in large numbers, motivated by economic insecurity and personal rights. However, despite voting to protect abortion rights in state referendums, many of these same women still supported Trump. Exit polls indicated that while white women broadly supported reproductive rights, their voting behavior was more complex, shaped by multiple intersecting issues. About 33% of suburban women cited inflation as their top concern, with rising costs impacting everything from household budgets to mortgage payments.

These women found themselves at a crossroads between social beliefs and economic fears. Trump’s promises of financial stability resonated with those feeling economically vulnerable, and his stance on issues like immigration and border security provided a sense of order amid uncertain times. While they supported reproductive rights, many felt that Trump’s approach to the economy and cultural conservatism aligned more closely with their priorities, leading to split ballots where they voted for abortion protections but ultimately backed Trump.

Democracy at a Crossroads: Voters’ Concerns for Integrity and Stability

While economic concerns took center stage, the issue of democracy resonated deeply with certain voter groups. About 18% of voters cited democracy as their top issue, with stark differences in how each side perceived the threat. For Trump supporters, who primarily viewed “democracy” through the lens of protecting national sovereignty and border integrity, safeguarding democracy meant preventing outside influences, strengthening border security, and securing America’s traditional values.

Conversely, Harris supporters defined democracy concerns as a response to Trump’s threats to democratic institutions. They cited his attempts to undermine the electoral process and his history of questioning electoral integrity as evidence of a democratic threat. These voters saw Harris as a candidate who would uphold the rule of law and counter authoritarianism. However, the complexities of these definitions underscore how deeply divided Americans remain about the very concept of democracy itself.

Implicit Biases and the Reluctance to Elect a Black Female President

Harris’s campaign represented a historic moment, but her identity as a Black woman may have also presented an obstacle for some voters. Analysts believe that subtle racial and gender biases influenced perceptions, with some voters hesitant to embrace a Black female leader. Despite broad polling support for diversity, implicit biases may have pushed certain voter groups toward Trump, preferring a candidate representing more traditional American leadership images. This reluctance underscores the lingering challenges around race and gender in U.S. politics.

Looking Ahead: Bridging a Nation’s Economic and Cultural Divide

Trump’s victory highlights the deep issues dividing the American electorate. His campaign’s success in exploiting economic insecurities, cultural anxieties, concerns over border security, and political disillusionment underscores the persistent demand for leadership that speaks to these concerns. In a polarized nation, the intersection of economic instability, cultural conservatism, skepticism toward change, and concerns over democracy will continue to shape the political landscape.

As America moves forward, this election raises questions about the values and emotions driving voters’ choices. Addressing these divisions will be essential for future leaders who aim to foster a unified, forward-looking vision for the country. However, as Trump’s victory shows, it will require more than policies—it will demand a deep understanding of the complexities fueling America’s divides.

Help Keep Big Easy Magazine Alive

Hey guys!

Covid-19 is challenging the way we conduct business. As small businesses suffer economic losses, they aren’t able to spend money advertising.

Please donate today to help us sustain local independent journalism and allow us to continue to offer subscription-free coverage of progressive issues.

Thank you,
Scott Ploof
Publisher
Big Easy Magazine


Share this Article

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *